The Watchdog: Common Crisis Mistakes Organizations Make with the Press

Photo Courtesy of: The Guardian

When a crisis hits an organization, the media go into a frenzy. Reporters question spokespeople and experts looking for a slip-up, a break in the news, or the exclusive sound bite. This dynamic makes it difficult for unseasoned media relations professionals to stay one-step ahead. To avoid the teeth of the watchdog press during a crisis, consider the following seven common mistakes that are made.

  1. Apologizing with a caveat. In a recent post, we discussed how many of today’s “apologizes” are coupled with a but statement. All too often, organizations attempt to apologize for their actions with an excuse, hoping it will ease the tension. Not only will the media see right through the excuse and report on it, studies show that consumers will be less likely to defend or use a brand if they feel executives are not taking full responsibility for a misstep. Think about the Netflix price-hike example or Bank of America’s attempt to hide additional bank fees from customers.
  2. It’s all about you. Think BP. When CEO Tony Hayward appeared on the Today Show after the Deepwater Horizon explosion, he said “we are sorry for the massive disruption it has caused their lives, and there is not one who wants this over more than I do, you know I’d like my life back.” That statement catapulted him further into the media spotlight, labeling him as a “thoughtless,” “hated,” and “clueless.”
  3. Defending the brand without a plan. When now former executive director Greg Smith made a very public exit from Goldman Sachs, the company seemed stunned. It quickly responded to Smith’s New York Times article with its own op-ed piece in the Financial Times. Interestingly enough they had no plan of action beyond the op-ed and no way to truly address the allegations brought up by Smith. This positioned Goldman Sachs in a classic David and Goliath battle in the media.
  4. Not seeing the silver lining in a crisis. Not every crisis has to be completely negative – companies like Domino’s have bounced back from a crisis because they were able to see the silver lining– the light at the end of the tunnel. Crisis can be an opportunity for change, and oftentimes organizations forget that. The press will pick up on efforts to make a real change post-crisis; whether that be conducting an audit, or reexamining policies, showing a movement towards change can help ease consumer’s worry of the future.
  5. Not picking the right spokesperson. Believe it or not, the CEO is not always the best spokesperson for a company. While it is important that they remain available for comment during a crisis, it is not always the best idea to have them as the headlining act. A spokesperson should have great speaking skills, credibility, charisma, experience working with the media, talking points and messages and a genuine interest in what is going on. This will help enhance the human element of an issue and make it easier for people to connect with the brand.
  6. Not understanding how competitor will leverage the crisis. When Susan G. Komen announced that they were defunding Planned Parenthood, a slew of competing breast cancer awareness organizations began highlighting the work that they were doing. People began to back the underdog. The media picked up on this break from Komen and began writing on the good work and help that these alternative organizations offered to breast cancer patients and their families.
  7. Not knowing all sides of the story. The quickest way to get into hot water with the media is to comment before knowing all sides of the story. This is when your “War Room” comes in. Getting everyone at the table to evaluate the situation, determine the effect of a crisis on different audiences, and decide on a plan of action will create a better crisis management strategy. It’s better to be ahead now than to have to fall back in the future.

By knowing these seven common mistakes, you can position your company to better respond to and handle the media during a crisis situation.

This Week’s Crisis Highlight: Ashton Kutcher & Popchips

Photo Courtesy of: The New York TimesAshton Kutcher is learning his lesson the hard way. And, unfortunately not by Demi Moore. Ashton, who appeared in a new advertising campaign for Popchips, portrayed four characters one of which was “Raj,” an Indian man. For the role, he appeared in brown-face, donning a dhoti, using a very bad Indian accent.

Not surprisingly, people took to the web, telling Popchips that the ad is racist. Shortly after, Popchips experienced what we call a “Flash Crisis.” The CEO and Founder of Popchips, Keith Belling issued this half-hearted apology on the company’s blog:

The apology, although swift, highlights two traps that company’s fall into: the but-apology and trying to excuse the company’s actions.

  • The “but” apology. It seems that every apology issued with a corresponding “but we didn’t mean too.” (insert link to apology video here). The CEO of Popchips would have been better off to fall on his sword and admit to the mistake instead of trying to justify the campaign with this statement “our team worked hard to create a light-hearted parody.” Needless to say, this apology continued to fuel the fire. In response, consumers posted angry comments on the blog vowing not to purchase the product because of this incident.
  • Excuses, excuses. Rather than simply admitting a mistake, many CEO’s are trying to cover their tracks or pass the buck. While in some cases, this may be a last-resort tactic recommended by the legal department, it most often will result in more questions, negativity and distrust among consumers, further exacerbating the crisis. While a safe approach to avoid litigation, the company will ultimately loose in the court of public opinion.

While both of these traps are defensive actions and often backfire, no one can deny that controversy creates brand recognition. Plenty of media covered the campaign and continues to do so, which begs an important question. Is this ad campaign a veiled attempt by the company to create controversy and word of mouth marketing? Will this ad stop you from buying Popchips?

Let us know what you think.

 

Preventing Crisis: Tip #12 – The Art of the Apology

Many people have tried to create the perfect apology. The problem is that there may not be one.

For years, CEOs have been apologizing badly. Check out this video to see how not to apologize in a crisis situation.

With every crisis there are different needs that arise. Stakeholders may need information, action items, support, prevention methods, etc. Each of those different needs requires a different type of apology. Take for instance, the BP Deepwater Horizon disaster. When the oil rig exploded off of the Gulf of Mexico the immediate worry was the ocean – almost immediately after, people along the Coast began to realize the affect this oil was going to have on their business and their livelihoods. The apology in this situation, would require not only action items, but also information and support.

Now consider the recent crisis Acura experienced. Many people remember Acura’s Super Bowl commercial with Jerry Seinfeld, competing to be the first person to own a new model car. What many people might not know is that the casting call for the Acura car salesperson, according to TMZ.com, read that the commercial needed an actor that was “nice looking, friendly, not too dark.” The Huffington Post stated that “Someone connected to the ad’s casting told TMZ that the skin tone restriction was to avoid problems with lighting and special effects.”

Once this story broke on TMZ, many people were enraged by the language used in the casting call. So what was Acura’s apology?

We apologize to anyone offended by the language on the casting sheet used in the selection of actors for one of our commercials. We sought to cast an African-American in a prominent role in the commercial, and we made our selection based on the fact that he was the most talented actor. The casting sheet was only now brought to our attention. We are taking appropriate measures to ensure that such language is not used again in association with any work performed on behalf of our brand.

This apology (which some may consider appropriate; others may not) is drastically different from that of the BP oil spill – as it should be. But as public relations and communications professionals try and navigate the growing intersection between traditional and social media, and request for transparency and consumer involvement, they may find that crafting an apology is more difficult than ever.

No one has all the answers, but here are five things to consider BEFORE your organization issues an apology:

  1. What is the real perception issue? Take the time to analyze what the issue is, what audience(s) do you need to be in most constant contact with, what level of involvement does your organization need to have, what are the needs of your audience(s), the degree of seriousness, etc. These will help your team to craft a more targeted and appropriate apology. Better yet, have a plan in place for issues that may arise in your industry before you need one.
  2. What method of communication will you use? Will you apologize on social media, through traditional media, perhaps a posting on your corporate newsroom or blog? Will you use a video statement or a print statement? Whichever platform your organization chooses to use, you have to consider your audience – keeping in mind that the more serious an crisis, the more involved the media will want to be. Think about the various factors and the best way to reach the audience with both the biggest need and the most attachment.
  3. Consult Legal. With every issue, there may be some legal implications. Thus, before issuing an apology, consult legal to see what you can and cannot say. This will help to prevent a larger issue from developing and will protect your organization down the line.
  4. Be human. No matter what the crisis, someone is, can potentially be, or inevitably will be affected. Keeping that in mind when crafting an apology will help to position your organization as “human.” Showing a more human-side, can help an organization maintain their reputation and their audience.
  5. Get everyone at the table. In any crisis, make sure you have the right people at the table. Consider all of the different facets of an issue when creating your “War Room.” A good War Room should have, in the least, C-Suite, spokespeople, legal, communications department, and experts (in issue area). Each of these different entities can help an organization craft an apology that is suitable for an audience and meets their needs.

Epic PR Group offers crisis training workshops that can help teams to better prepare for and deal with crisis situations. Want to find out if you are prepared? Take Epic’s PR Heat Index quiz and find out! Receive a detailed breakdown of your scores and resources for moving forward.

If you are interested in learning more email info@epicprgroup.com and mention “Art of an Apology” or visit our website at www.epicprgroup.com

Preventing Crisis: Tip #1 – Know the Three Ps

Photo Courtesy of: The Dry Bones BlogAccording to a recent study, 79% of business decision-makers across the globe expect to experience a crisis within the next year – only half of those people said that their company currently has a crisis communications plan. There are ways to reduce your risk of falling victim to a crisis – the first is knowing the three Ps.

Before you make a big announcement or decision it is essential that you prepare for and consider the worst-case scenario. While not everything will spark a controversy, there are certain topics that are more likely than others to trigger an emotional reaction (topics like veterans, family planning, animal welfare, fundamental rights, etc.). 

If you’re concerned that a decision or a policy will be unpopular with your audience, do the necessary research and preparation before making a public statement. If you’re anticipating negative feedback, consider investing in focus groups or surveys to gauge consumer reactions ahead of time.

Not every announcement merits research, but if your announcement relates to the three P’s, it may be worth doing some additional investigation:

  • Policy. Komen’s decision to cut funding to Planned Parenthood was policy driven. Many crises erupt after organizations announce unpopular policies that strike a nerve with consumers.
  • Perception. Are you changing your brand or positioning strategy? Consider conducting a focus group or doing qualitative research first. Last year, Gap experienced a Flash Crisis after the company changed its logo, and enraged consumers slammed the design on social media.
  • Procedures. If your organization is making a procedural change that will affect your constituents, get some opinions before going public. Remember all the uproar after Netflix changed its streaming service?

When it comes to handling a PR crisis, organizations need to make sure they prepare ahead of time. This will save headaches, panic, and money down the road.

One way to make sure you are prepared is to take Epic PR Group’s PR Heat Index quiz. The PR Heat Index will help you decide if your company is prepared to handle a crisis situation. After taking the quiz you will receive a detailed breakdown of your score that can help spark a meaningful conversation about crisis management.

Consumer messages on social media: A delicate balance

Photo courtesy of: k8mc.wordpress.com

Feeling overwhelmed by too much information lately?

Blame social media. There are over 800 million people on Facebook, and over 100 million on Twitter. With so much information being shared daily, hourly and up-to-the-minute, organizations need to find ways to cut through the clutter and create memorable content.

In order to do that, social media must be placed in the context of a larger communications and marketing strategy. Data from TolunaQuick indicates that more than 50% of respondents felt overwhelmed by brand messages on social media and only 45% indicated that they choose to interact with brands on social media.

Other findings include –

    • 40% of respondents felt that brand promotions are too complex to even enter;
    • 75% said that one or two Facebook messages per day is too much to receive from a brand;
    • Only 20% said they proactively post messages to brand pages; and
    • 80% “like” brands on Facebook and almost 50% look to social media for news and updates about brands.

Clearly, social media content needs to be valuable and relevant for consumers to get engaged. With that in mind, here are a few tips to make your content really come alive:

Tell a story. Storytelling is one of the most powerful ways to get consumers to connect with your brand. But don’t limit it to just your story (that’s boring and sales-ey). Get stories from members, clients, and partners and share them. Let your champions share their stories and speak for you.

Be human. Avoid posts and tweets that sound robotic or automated. Let your brand’s personality shine through. Isn’t that the point of social media?

Minimize your self-promotion. If you look at Whole Foods’ Twitter feed, you’ll notice that 85% of their tweets are customer service responses, 10% original content, and only 5% promotions.

Understand social mood. What’s trending right this instant? What topics are the media covering? What are people talking about, concerned with, or excited about? Not factoring these considerations into your digital content is a missed opportunity to connect with consumers.

Don’t bombard your audience with content. Limit it to 3 posts or Tweets a day. Be a listener, not just a talker.

With these tips in mind, consider how a digital content strategy can connect your stakeholders with your cause, your services, philosophy, etc.

So what are you waiting for? Start the conversation.